<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>danwin.com &#187; puppies</title>
	<atom:link href="https://danwin.com/tag/puppies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://danwin.com</link>
	<description>Words, photos, and code by Dan Nguyen. The &#039;g&#039; is mostly silent.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Hypertext-Wired Brains and Irrelevancy</title>
		<link>https://danwin.com/2010/05/internet-wired-brains-and-irrelevancy/</link>
		<comments>https://danwin.com/2010/05/internet-wired-brains-and-irrelevancy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 17:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irrelevancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puppies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://danwin.com/?p=827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Something tells me that these two areas of study, unfortunately, have interrelated results: From Wired, &#8220;The Web Shatters Focus, Rewires Brain&#8221; (Nicholas Carr): Research was painting a fuller, very different picture of the cognitive effects of hypertext. Navigating linked documents, it turned out, entails a lot of mental calisthenicsâ€”evaluating hyperlinks, deciding whether to click, adjusting [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/05/internet-wired-brains-and-irrelevancy/">Hypertext-Wired Brains and Irrelevancy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something tells me that these two areas of study, unfortunately, have interrelated results:</p>
<p>From Wired, &#8220;<a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/05/ff_nicholas_carr/all/1">The Web Shatters Focus, Rewires Brain</a>&#8221; (Nicholas Carr):</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Research was painting a fuller, very different picture of the cognitive effects of hypertext.</strong> Navigating linked documents, it turned out, entails a lot of mental calisthenicsâ€”evaluating hyperlinks, deciding whether to click, adjusting to different formatsâ€”that are extraneous to the process of reading. Because it disrupts concentration, such activity weakens comprehension. A 1989 study showed that readers tended just to click around aimlessly when reading something that included hypertext links to other selected pieces of information. <strong>A 1990 experiment revealed that some â€œcould not remember what they had and had not read</strong>.â€</p></blockquote>
<p>From the New York Times, &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/30/business/30view.html?src=busln">The Impact of the Irrelevant on Decision-Making</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p>An intriguing example of transparently irrelevant information that affects behavior comes from a 1974 report on an experiment by the psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. In the experiment, subjects first spun a wheel that supposedly would stop at random on any number between 1 and 100. Then they were asked what percentage of African countries belongs to the United Nations. For one group of subjects, the wheel was rigged to stop on 10; for a second group, on 65. On average, the first group guessed that 25 percent belong to the United Nations, but the second group guessed 45 percent.</p>
<p><strong>In short, even demonstrably false or irrelevant information can influence judgments, which in turn influence decisions</strong>. In such cases, Professors Tversky and Kahneman wrote in 1981,<strong> â€œthe adoption of a decision frame is an ethically significant act.â€</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7bcV-TL9mho&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7bcV-TL9mho&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>On a sidenote, <a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/05/ff_nicholas_carr/all/1">also from the Wired article</a>, this makes you wonder about print media&#8217;s early attempts to do news video:</p>
<blockquote><p>In a study published in the journal Media Psychology, researchers had more than 100 volunteers watch a presentation about the country of Mali, played through a Web browser. Some watched a text-only version. Others watched a version that incorporated video. Afterward, the subjects were quizzed on the material. Compared to the multimedia viewers, the text-only viewers answered significantly more questions correctly; they also found the presentation to be more interesting, more educational, more understandable, and more enjoyable.</p></blockquote>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/05/internet-wired-brains-and-irrelevancy/">Hypertext-Wired Brains and Irrelevancy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://danwin.com/2010/05/internet-wired-brains-and-irrelevancy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
