<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>danwin.com &#187; pete hoekstra</title>
	<atom:link href="https://danwin.com/tag/pete-hoekstra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://danwin.com</link>
	<description>Words, photos, and code by Dan Nguyen. The &#039;g&#039; is mostly silent.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Rep. Pete Hoekstra not behind PeteHoekstra.com&#8230;but was able to out the guy who is</title>
		<link>https://danwin.com/2010/01/rep-pete-hoekstra-not-behind-petehoekstra-com-but-was-able-to-out-the-guy-who-is/</link>
		<comments>https://danwin.com/2010/01/rep-pete-hoekstra-not-behind-petehoekstra-com-but-was-able-to-out-the-guy-who-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pete hoekstra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://danwin.com/thoughts/rep-pete-hoekstra-not-behind-petehoekstra-com-but-was-able-to-out-the-guy-who-is/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>PeteHoekstra.com was snapped out by an anonymous registrar and began posting anti-Rep. Pete Hoekstra screeds. Though the registration was presumably private, somehow Rep. Hoekstra&#8217;s staff was able to out the owner, Ben Pardos Padnos, a longtime Internet entrepreneur who claims to own thousands of domains, including those belonging to other politicians. Padnos said he was [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/01/rep-pete-hoekstra-not-behind-petehoekstra-com-but-was-able-to-out-the-guy-who-is/">Rep. Pete Hoekstra not behind PeteHoekstra.com&#8230;but was able to out the guy who is</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.petehoekstra.com/">PeteHoekstra.com</a> was snapped out by an anonymous registrar and began posting anti-<a href="http://www.petehoekstra.com/">Rep. Pete Hoekstra</a> screeds.</p>
<p>Though the registration was presumably private, somehow <a href="http://www.petehoekstra.com/?p=124">Rep. Hoekstra&#8217;s staff was able to out the owner</a>, Ben <s>Pardos</s> Padnos, a longtime Internet entrepreneur who claims to own thousands of domains, including those belonging to other politicians.</p>
<p>Padnos <a href="http://www.petehoekstra.com/?p=124">said he was spurred to snatch the domain</a>, which previously belonged to a soccer player, after Rep. Hoekstra&#8217;s fundraising campaign in the aftermath of the failed underpants-bombing incident:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The first thing I thought when I saw the Grand Rapids Press coverage with my name was, â€œHmmm, being on the Intelligence Committee must come with some privileges!â€</p>
<p>Secondly, I said to myself, â€œSo much for anonymity with private domain registration!â€</p>
<p>Somehow, the Hoekstra Campaign tracked down that the owner of the domain is me, Ben Padnos.</p>
<p>I want to start with one important point regarding anonymity. I intended to be anonymous purely to avoid any possible embarrassment for my family members, who live in Pete Hoekstraâ€™s district, and have a business in West Michigan. Anything written on PeteHoekstra.com represents ME, personally, and not any of my other family members.</p>
<p>Youâ€™ll note that even though I perceived myself as having anonymity, everything I posted Iâ€™d feel completely comfortable looking the Congressman in the eye and saying to his face. The Internet purist in me â€“ Iâ€™ve been involved in online industry since 1996 â€“ doesnâ€™t like the low-brow level anonymity sometimes provides. Weâ€™ve been hard-hitting, but not vulgar or profane. People often hide behind anonymity in â€œCyberspaceâ€ and take it to a very low, crass, disrespectful level. I donâ€™t like that.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The <a href="http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2010/01/post_101.html">Grand Rapids News</a>, to whom Rep. Hokestra&#8217;s staff tattled on Padnos, is silent on how Hoekstra&#8217;s staff found Padnos in the first place.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/01/rep-pete-hoekstra-not-behind-petehoekstra-com-but-was-able-to-out-the-guy-who-is/">Rep. Pete Hoekstra not behind PeteHoekstra.com&#8230;but was able to out the guy who is</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://danwin.com/2010/01/rep-pete-hoekstra-not-behind-petehoekstra-com-but-was-able-to-out-the-guy-who-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
