<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>danwin.com &#187; internets</title>
	<atom:link href="https://danwin.com/tag/internets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://danwin.com</link>
	<description>Words, photos, and code by Dan Nguyen. The &#039;g&#039; is mostly silent.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Letter from the Wikimedia Community Health Task Force</title>
		<link>https://danwin.com/2010/01/letter-from-the-wikimedia-community-health-task-force/</link>
		<comments>https://danwin.com/2010/01/letter-from-the-wikimedia-community-health-task-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://danwin.com/thoughts/letter-from-the-wikimedia-community-health-task-force/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My first thought at the sender&#8217;s name was that the Wikiworld was going to put its crowdsourcing muscle into crafting a heatlh-care bill. But no, apparently I haven&#8217;t been contributing enough to Wikipedia, as I received this email today: from Wikimedia Community Health Task Force date Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:43 PM subject Survey [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/01/letter-from-the-wikimedia-community-health-task-force/">Letter from the Wikimedia Community Health Task Force</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought at the sender&#8217;s name was that the Wikiworld was going to put its crowdsourcing muscle into crafting a heatlh-care bill. But no, apparently I haven&#8217;t been contributing enough to Wikipedia, as I received this email today:</p>
<blockquote><p>
from	<strong>Wikimedia Community Health Task Force <strategy@wikimedia.org></strong><br />
date	Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:43 PM<br />
subject	Survey from Wikipedia<br />
mailed-by	wikimedia.org</p>
<p>Hello </p>
<p>We are studying the habits of Wikipedia contributors, seeking to identify and address reasons why people stop contributing. We noticed that you haven&#8217;t made any edits in a while, and we&#8217;re wondering where you&#8217;ve been.</p>
<p>We would appreciate 5 minutes of your time to complete an online survey.  We&#8217;re constantly looking for ways to improve our community and your responses will help us understand what Wikipedia is doing well and what we can improve on.</p>
<p>Please click on the link below to be directed to the survey.</p>
<p>http://survey.wikimedia.org/index.php?sid=15963&#038;newtest=Y&#038;lang=en</p>
<p>Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia and for your help in improving our community.</p>
<p>The Wikimedia Community Health Task Force<br />
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Task_force/Community_Health</p>
<p>The Wikimedia Community Health Task Force represents a group volunteers examining ways to improve the health of the communities for the Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia.</p>
<p>As always, we are very careful to protect your privacy.  Responses will be reviewed anonymously and data will be presented in aggregate form only.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This calls to mind the <a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125893981183759969.html&#038;ei=I9pfS-nTO5OxlAfj6rzbCw&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=spellmeleon_result&#038;resnum=1&#038;ct=result&#038;ved=0CAcQhgIwAA&#038;usg=AFQjCNFjS7QyhfTkSByglc3e-OXdcXi4rA">WSJ article a few months back about how 49,000 Wikipedia volunteer editors stopped editing in the first quarter of 2009</a> (compared to a net loss of 4,900 in during the same period in 2008). Frustration with overzealous editors rejecting work is cited as a big reason. I&#8217;ve never had that experience&#8230;I&#8217;m mostly submitted grammar and style changes which, for the most part, still remain. Also, wikipedia has just become so solid a source that it&#8217;s hard to contribute anything that feels valuable without really putting a lot of effort into it. I made a lot more edits back when proper nouns were misspelled. Now, fixing a comma splice doesn&#8217;t have the same satisfaction.</p>
<p>The survey&#8217;s questions:</p>
<blockquote><p>
1:  When did you start editing? </p>
<p>2: When did you make your last edit? </p>
<p>3:  During your time as an active editor, roughly how many edits did you make in a typical month? </p>
<p>4: *Why did you start contributing to Wikipedia?<br />
#  I saw a typo or small error and wanted to fix it<br />
# There was information that I wanted to add<br />
# I like the idea of volunteering to share knowledge<br />
# I enjoy researching and writing<br />
# I was assigned to do it (e.g., by work or school)<br />
# I wanted to test Wikipedia to see if it was really open for anyone to edit<br />
# Friends of mine were doing it </p>
<p>: * Why did you stop contributing to Wikipedia?<br />
Check at most 3 answers</p>
<p>    * I had other commitments (e.g. new job, new hobbies, started a family).<br />
    * I contributed enough information to improve the articles I was interested in.<br />
    * Writing an encyclopedic article is difficult and/or time consuming.<br />
    * Editing and maintaining articles takes too much time for me.<br />
    * Wikipedia is too confusing.<br />
    * I felt that I was often working alone, with little feedback or support.<br />
    * I found the atmosphere unpleasant.<br />
    * Some editors made Wikipedia a difficult place to work.<br />
    * I haven&#8217;t stopped contributing.<br />
    * Other: </p>
<p>6: At the time of your last edit, did you personally feel like you still had a lot to add to the Wikipedia? </p>
<p>7: What was your most rewarding experience with Wikipedia? Why?</p>
<p>8: What was your worst experience with Wikipedia?  Why?<br />
(Answers will be kept anonymous and no action will be taken. This is for survey purposes only.)</p>
<p> 9: *Did the difficulty of the work have an impact on your decision to stop contributing?<br />
Check at most 3 answers</p>
<p>    * Yes. Writing an article is too difficult, or too much work.<br />
    * Yes. I had difficulties with the editing interface.<br />
    * Yes. I had difficulties with the discussion interface.<br />
    * Yes. Watching and maintaining multiple articles was difficult/took too much time.<br />
    * Yes. I had trouble understanding the rules about Wikipedia content.<br />
    * Yes. I had trouble understanding the rules about volunteer behavior.<br />
    * No. Complexity was not a major reason in my decision to leave.<br />
    * No. I havenâ€™t stopped contributing. </p>
<p> 10: Did the community have an impact on your decision stop contributing?<br />
Check at most 3 answers</p>
<p>    * Yes. I asked for help, but did not receive the help that I needed.<br />
    * Yes. I did not receive much feedback or appreciation for my work.<br />
    * Yes. I was warned or sanctioned and decided to leave.<br />
    * Yes. It took too much time to discuss content and build support for changes.<br />
    * Yes. Several editors were rude to either me or my peers.<br />
    * Yes. Several editors were too stubborn and/or difficult to work with.<br />
    * Yes. My work kept on being undone.<br />
    * No. The community was not a major reason in my decision to leave.<br />
    * No. I havenâ€™t stopped contributing.<br />
    * Other: </p>
<p>11: *On a scale of 1-5, how likely are you to start contributing again?</p>
<p> 12: Please read the following statements and select all that you believe are TRUE.</p>
<p>Check any that apply</p>
<p>    * I stopped contributing because of something that happened in my life: it had nothing much to do with Wikipedia.<br />
    * I regret that I had to stop editing Wikipedia.<br />
    * When I think back on my time editing Wikipedia, I feel anger, frustration, or other unpleasant emotions.<br />
    * I would (or do) tell my friends to consider editing Wikipedia.<br />
    * I think I am very different from the typical Wikipedia editor.<br />
    * I will never edit Wikipedia again.<br />
    * I hope one day to edit again, if changes in my personal or work circumstances make that possible for me.<br />
    * I hope one day to edit again, if changes at Wikipedia make that possible for me.</p>
<p>13: Is there anything else you would like us to know? </p>
<p>14: What is your Wikipedia username? (Optional) </p>
<p>15: *Would you be willing to have someone contact you for a 10-minute phone call or online chat to further discuss your experience with Wikipedia?
</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that the &#8220;Wikimedia Community Health Task Force&#8221; is a new initiative, as a google search for that term brings up this blog entry as the first result.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/01/letter-from-the-wikimedia-community-health-task-force/">Letter from the Wikimedia Community Health Task Force</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://danwin.com/2010/01/letter-from-the-wikimedia-community-health-task-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
