<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>danwin.com &#187; gwitterbook</title>
	<atom:link href="https://danwin.com/tag/gwitterbook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://danwin.com</link>
	<description>Words, photos, and code by Dan Nguyen. The &#039;g&#039; is mostly silent.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Google Buzz == Gwitterbook</title>
		<link>https://danwin.com/2010/02/google-buzz-gwitterbook/</link>
		<comments>https://danwin.com/2010/02/google-buzz-gwitterbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gwitterbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://danwin.com/thoughts/google-buzz-gwitterbook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, my first impression of Google Buzz is that it&#8217;s a convenient way to FriendFeed my stuff to Google contacts. But I&#8217;m surprised at how poor of an interface it released with&#8230;I can&#8217;t recall the last major online service where I&#8217;ve been so confused on how to perform as simple a task as finding the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/02/google-buzz-gwitterbook/">Google Buzz == Gwitterbook</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://danwin.com/words/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/buzz-logo.gif"><img src="https://danwin.com/words/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/buzz-logo-300x89.gif" alt="" title="buzz-logo" width="300" height="89" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-389" /></a></p>
<p>Well, my first impression of <a href="http://buzz.google.com">Google Buzz</a> is that it&#8217;s a convenient way to FriendFeed my stuff to Google contacts. But I&#8217;m surprised at how poor of an interface it released with&#8230;I can&#8217;t recall the last major online service where I&#8217;ve been so confused on how to perform as simple a task as finding the settings panel. For example, last night I stumbled upon the option to set my Buzz to be &#8220;Public&#8221; or &#8220;Private&#8221;&#8230;and it took me awhile to remember how I got there this morning. The shortest path that I&#8217;ve found is to click on my own name in Google Buzz, then find the &#8220;profile link&#8221;, which takes me to another intermediary page where I have to divine that the link &#8220;Add more info to profile&#8221; will take me to a few basic privacy settings.</p>
<p><strong>How about a simple &#8220;Privacy settings&#8221; link that Facebook wisely added at least a year ago?</strong> Why didn&#8217;t Google learn such an obvious feature from the leader?</p>
<p>This confusion is pretty inexcusable given that I&#8217;ve been on GMail for at least four years&#8230;this interface should be at least halfway intuitive. Even worse, there&#8217;s little to assure me how specific and granular these settings are. Facebook deserves to be criticized for its privacy missteps, but it&#8217;s done a fine job in giving us a huge amount of flexibility in designating what is viewable to whom.</p>
<p>With Buzz, I know there&#8217;s some kind of change between a &#8220;Private&#8221; and &#8220;Public&#8221; Google profile&#8230;but does setting it Private also make it so that random people can&#8217;t follow my Buzz? Or just that my profile information (city, date of birth, mugshot, etc) is hidden? Maybe Buzz wanted to go for the &#8220;Apple&#8221; approach in arrogantly deciding what&#8217;s best for the user in order to have the most clutter-free interface. But I think privacy concerns trump having a lowest-common-denominator interface.</p>
<p>Especially since Google is already in the limelight for owning too much of our personal information. Now they&#8217;ll have a database of every status update you made, and if it was from your phone, where you were.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s sloppy approach has already made for some awful PR: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/warning-google-buzz-has-a-huge-privacy-flaw-2010-2">WARNING: Google Buzz has a huge privacy flaw</a>, says Silicon Alley, referring to how Buzz automatically sets you up to follow your most-contacted people.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call that a huge privacy flaw&#8230;99% of people would be OK with following the people they message the most. But for journalists who may be using GMail for contacting anonymous sources&#8230;that&#8217;s a horrible default setting. Actually, I think the problem is that by default, this list of followers is publicly available&#8230;unless you go into the settings and find the appropriate checkbox. Now how do you get to the privacy settings again?&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/02/google-buzz-gwitterbook/">Google Buzz == Gwitterbook</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://danwin.com/2010/02/google-buzz-gwitterbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
