<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>danwin.com &#187; censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="https://danwin.com/tag/censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://danwin.com</link>
	<description>Words, photos, and code by Dan Nguyen. The &#039;g&#039; is mostly silent.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Apple banned Pulitzer-Prize winning cartoonist&#8217;s app because it &#8220;ridicules public figures&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://danwin.com/2010/04/apple-banned-pulitzer-prize-winning-cartoonists-app-because-it-ridicules-public-figures/</link>
		<comments>https://danwin.com/2010/04/apple-banned-pulitzer-prize-winning-cartoonists-app-because-it-ridicules-public-figures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[csilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark fiore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulitzer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://danwin.com/?p=746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Pulitzer-Prize winning cartoonist Mark Fiore, who won this year&#8217;s Pulitzer for his editorial cartoons, says he tried to make an iPhone app but it was just too politically hot for Apple&#8217;s guidelines. From Nieman Labs (h/t Poynter): In December, Apple rejected his iPhone app, NewsToons, because, as Apple put it, his satire â€œridicules public figures,â€ [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/04/apple-banned-pulitzer-prize-winning-cartoonists-app-because-it-ridicules-public-figures/">Apple banned Pulitzer-Prize winning cartoonist&#8217;s app because it &#8220;ridicules public figures&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pulitzer-Prize winning cartoonist <strong>Mark Fiore</strong>, <a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/citation/2010-Editorial-Cartooning">who won this year&#8217;s Pulitzer for his editorial cartoon</a>s, says he tried to make an iPhone app but it was just too politically hot for Apple&#8217;s guidelines. From <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/04/mark-fiore-can-win-a-pulitzer-prize-but-he-cant-get-his-iphone-cartoon-app-past-apples-satire-police/">Nieman Labs</a> (h/t <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=134&#038;aid=181544">Poynter</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>In December, Apple rejected his iPhone app, NewsToons, because, as Apple put it, his satire â€œridicules public figures,â€ a violation of the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement, which bars any apps whose content in â€œAppleâ€™s reasonable judgement may be found objectionable, for example, materials that may be considered obscene, pornographic, or defamatory.â€<br />
&#8230;<br />
Apple attached screenshots of the offending material, including an image depicting the White House gate crashers interrupting an Obama speech. Two other grabs include images referencing torture, Balloon Boy, and various political issues.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="https://danwin.com/words/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/fiorecrashers.png"><img src="https://danwin.com/words/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/fiorecrashers.png" alt="" title="fiorecrashers" width="250" height="166" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-747" /></a><br />
Here&#8217;s an &#8220;offending image&#8221; of Fiore&#8217;s. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/04/apple-banned-pulitzer-prize-winning-cartoonists-app-because-it-ridicules-public-figures/">Apple banned Pulitzer-Prize winning cartoonist&#8217;s app because it &#8220;ridicules public figures&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://danwin.com/2010/04/apple-banned-pulitzer-prize-winning-cartoonists-app-because-it-ridicules-public-figures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton in China, and &#8220;Internet Freedom&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://danwin.com/2010/01/clinton-in-china-and-internet-freedom/</link>
		<comments>https://danwin.com/2010/01/clinton-in-china-and-internet-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://danwin.com/thoughts/clinton-in-china-and-internet-freedom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As I speak to you today, government censors somewhere are working furiously to erase my words from the records of history. But history itself has already condemned these tactics.&#8221; &#8211; Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Jan. 21, 2010</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/01/clinton-in-china-and-internet-freedom/">Clinton in China, and &#8220;Internet Freedom&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As I speak to you today, government censors somewhere are working furiously to erase my words from the records of history. But history itself has already condemned these tactics.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; <A href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2010/01/a_momentous_40_hours.php">Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Jan. 21, 2010</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/01/clinton-in-china-and-internet-freedom/">Clinton in China, and &#8220;Internet Freedom&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://danwin.com/2010/01/clinton-in-china-and-internet-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google publicly calls out China over hacking of human rights advocates&#8217; accounts</title>
		<link>https://danwin.com/2010/01/google-publicly-calls-out-china-over-hacking-of-human-rights-advocates-accounts/</link>
		<comments>https://danwin.com/2010/01/google-publicly-calls-out-china-over-hacking-of-human-rights-advocates-accounts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://danwin.com/thoughts/google-publicly-calls-out-china-over-hacking-of-human-rights-advocates-accounts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On the Google Blog, Google&#8217;s chief legal counsel David Drummond reveals that a &#8220;highly sophisticated and targeted&#8221; attack on its corporate infrastructure was traced back to China. The objective, Google believes, was to compromise the GMail accounts of Chinese human-rights activists (two were accessed, Google believes, with no actual content revealed). This attack has apparently [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/01/google-publicly-calls-out-china-over-hacking-of-human-rights-advocates-accounts/">Google publicly calls out China over hacking of human rights advocates&#8217; accounts</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html">Google Blog</a>, Google&#8217;s chief legal counsel David Drummond reveals that a &#8220;highly sophisticated and targeted&#8221; attack on its corporate infrastructure was traced back to China. The objective, Google believes, was to compromise the GMail accounts of Chinese human-rights activists (two were accessed, Google believes, with no actual content revealed).</p>
<p>This attack has apparently put a bug in Google&#8217;s conscience; Drummond writes that they are no longer willing to self-censor Google.cn:</p>
<blockquote><p>
These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered&#8211;combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web&#8211;have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com/2010/01/google-publicly-calls-out-china-over-hacking-of-human-rights-advocates-accounts/">Google publicly calls out China over hacking of human rights advocates&#8217; accounts</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://danwin.com">danwin.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://danwin.com/2010/01/google-publicly-calls-out-china-over-hacking-of-human-rights-advocates-accounts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
