<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who better understands freedom of the press? An Apple supplier, or Chinese state police?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://danwin.com/2010/02/who-better-understands-freedom-of-the-press-apple-suppliers-or-chinese-state-police/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://danwin.com/2010/02/who-better-understands-freedom-of-the-press-apple-suppliers-or-chinese-state-police/</link>
	<description>Words, photos, and code by Dan Nguyen. The &#039;g&#039; is mostly silent.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2025 04:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bercovici on 4G-iPhone: Apple could sue Gawker for buying &#8220;stolen goods&#8221; &#124; Danwin: Dan Nguyen, in short</title>
		<link>https://danwin.com/2010/02/who-better-understands-freedom-of-the-press-apple-suppliers-or-chinese-state-police/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bercovici on 4G-iPhone: Apple could sue Gawker for buying &#8220;stolen goods&#8221; &#124; Danwin: Dan Nguyen, in short]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://danwin.com/thoughts/who-better-understands-freedom-of-the-press-apple-suppliers-or-chinese-state-police/#comment-371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] On the other hand, I hope that if this disclosure can be shown not to have hurt Apple&#8217;s bottom line, I hope they ease up on their infamous, and now-tiringly-overdone commitment to secrecy. Not for the sake of its info-hungry fans, but for the workers employed by police-state-like distributors. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] On the other hand, I hope that if this disclosure can be shown not to have hurt Apple&#8217;s bottom line, I hope they ease up on their infamous, and now-tiringly-overdone commitment to secrecy. Not for the sake of its info-hungry fans, but for the workers employed by police-state-like distributors. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ×‘×™×˜×•×— ×¨×›×‘: ×©×œ×•×©×™× ×™×ž×™ ×—×¡×“</title>
		<link>https://danwin.com/2010/02/who-better-understands-freedom-of-the-press-apple-suppliers-or-chinese-state-police/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[×‘×™×˜×•×— ×¨×›×‘: ×©×œ×•×©×™× ×™×ž×™ ×—×¡×“]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://danwin.com/thoughts/who-better-understands-freedom-of-the-press-apple-suppliers-or-chinese-state-police/#comment-297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;×‘×™×˜×•×— ×¨×›×‘: ×©×œ×•×©×™× ×™×ž×™ ×—×¡×“...&lt;/strong&gt;

... ×‘×™×˜×•×— ×¨×›×‘: ×©×œ×•×©×™× ×™×ž×™ ×—×¡×“ × ×›×ª×‘ ×¢×œ ×™×“×™ ×—×™×™× ×§×œ×™×¨ ×‘××—×“ ×”×™×ž×™× ×”×¡×™×¢ ×ž××™×¨ ×¢×©×•×¨ × ×•×¡×¢×ª ×‘×¨×›×‘×•. ××™×¨×¢×” ×ª××•× ×ª ×“×¨×›×™× ×•×”× ×•×¡×¢×ª × ×¤×’×¢×”. ×‘×ž×•×¢×“ ×”×ª××•× ×” ×”×™×” ×¨×›×‘×• ×©×œ ×¢×©×•×¨ ×ž×‘×•×˜×— ×‘×‘×™×˜×•... - Who better understands freedom of the press? An Apple supplier, or ... ......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>×‘×™×˜×•×— ×¨×›×‘: ×©×œ×•×©×™× ×™×ž×™ ×—×¡×“&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230; ×‘×™×˜×•×— ×¨×›×‘: ×©×œ×•×©×™× ×™×ž×™ ×—×¡×“ × ×›×ª×‘ ×¢×œ ×™×“×™ ×—×™×™× ×§×œ×™×¨ ×‘××—×“ ×”×™×ž×™× ×”×¡×™×¢ ×ž××™×¨ ×¢×©×•×¨ × ×•×¡×¢×ª ×‘×¨×›×‘×•. ××™×¨×¢×” ×ª××•× ×ª ×“×¨×›×™× ×•×”× ×•×¡×¢×ª × ×¤×’×¢×”. ×‘×ž×•×¢×“ ×”×ª××•× ×” ×”×™×” ×¨×›×‘×• ×©×œ ×¢×©×•×¨ ×ž×‘×•×˜×— ×‘×‘×™×˜×•&#8230; &#8211; Who better understands freedom of the press? An Apple supplier, or &#8230; &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
